Posted: June 14, 2010 in Uncategorized


I am struggling a little with the book I am reading at the moment, and a review will no doubt appear at some time in the future. Unless the second half is a much better read than the turgid first half my review might put me in a minority of one, because this author has won everything available in this galaxy, and is incredibly popular.

Let’s hope it is a book of two halves, because it has been a real challenge to get this far without sending it to the charity shop.
Do other people ever find that they read a new author, who everyone else says is superb, and you just find them a bit boring?

Updating Amy’s Scandinavian Crime Fiction Challenge, I have read five of the six books to complete the challenge.
And for Dorte’s 2010 Global Challenge, which I am attempting at the medium level, I have read ten of the twelve books required [although I cheated and read two from the USA, because I had not read the instructions properly] and now need two Australasian books read to complete the challenge.

These challenges will have to await completion for a while.

When I finish the problem book I will move on to read something that I am sure will be more my scene, The White Gallows by Rob Kitchin, who blogs at The View from the Blue House; and then “Banks is Back” as I have Peter Robinson’s latest book Bad Boy on my schedule, my review of that one will appear on Euro Crime in due course.
  1. >Norman – I know just what you mean about an author others truly like and you don't. That's happened to me, too… I haven't read The White Gallows yet, but I'm eager to, and if The Rule Book is any indication, it'll be a good read.

  2. >I was really chuffed that Rob used part of my review among his blurbs, and I am keen to move on to start The White Gallows. The current book has been burbling on about a subject that I know a lot about [there are a few ;o)] and it is really annoying me, but surely it must get better soon………..

  3. >Norman I can empathaise. I seem to be the only human on the planet who doesn't get Jo Nesbo as I got stuck about a third of the way into The Redbreast and wanted to gouge my own eyes out with a spoon – rarely for me i have put it aside to try again one day (normally I wouldn't bother but I figure everyone else loves him so it must have been something about my mood at the time that made it unreadable to me).

  4. Amy says:

    >Hi Uriah,I'm dealing with a problem book right now too. It is so incredibly lifeless that I just want to toss it. I can't see what the fuss is about. So, is "really chuffed" a good thing or a bad thing? Take care,Amywww.theblacksheepdances.com

  5. >Norman, I'm more intrigued about the book are you reading.

  6. >Bernadette, I must admit that I found The Redbreast, a little difficult, but Nemesis, The Devil's Star, The Redeemer [not quite as good] and The Snowman are brilliant in my opinion. If we all liked the same books it would be a very dull world. Amy, "really chuffed' is an informal British expression that dates to the 1950s [when I was growing up] and means very pleased. I will try and stop using these informalities, but in case I don't if something goes "pear shaped" it means it has failed dismally. We aren't reading the same book are we? ;o) Jose Ignacio, very sorry it will have to remain a secret until I finish the book. ;o) I am over 200 pages in now so only another 170 to go.

  7. Dorte H says:

    >Great progress on your challenges! And I agree with Bernadette and others, it is absolutely okay not to like what other readers loved. I have also tried to get into the Italian writers you are so fond of in FriendFeed, but so far I have not been really thrilled about any of them. But you mustn´t stop using expressions like ´chuffed´. I learn quite a lot by reading Donna´s blog (and her books!), and as long as there is a person behind the blog we can ask it is just great to expand one´s horizon.

  8. >Thanks Dorte. I also love Donna's Glaswegian gems, and they remind me of a dear Scottish uncle [married to one of my mother's six sisters], who died tragically young. His strong Glasgow accent meant I never understood a single word he said! I will continue to try to include some 1950s cockney expressions and hope things don't go "pear shaped". ;o)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s